![]() ![]() The Dalai Lama’s Succession: Strategic Realities of the Tibet Question In a way, China strongly view that the G-7 is an anti-China group and demands that it should be abandoned, writes Adlakha. Beijing has even called the G7 as an “illegal” grouping. lobbying efforts to “coerce” them into becoming Washington’s tool. ![]() He argues that notwithstanding the just concluded G7 finance ministers meet in Niigata, Japan not mentioning China in the joint communique – unlike the strongly worded joint statement demanding China to “act responsibly” released by the G7 foreign ministers meet in Nagano, Japan a month ago, even before G7 leaders arrived in Hiroshima – Beijing warned them all to not succumb to U.S. Hemant Adlakha writes on the Chinese reaction to the Group of Seven (G-7). Perhaps, the warning is more for Indian policymakers than American, writes Kamal.Īs G7 Leaders want Beijing to Abide by “International Rules,” China wants the West to Abandon G7 now suddenly expect India to join a U.S.-led military alliance in a potential conflict with China – an aim that most credible India watchers in Washington have and will continue to see as unachievable in the context of India’s long held principles of non-alignment and strategic autonomy. expectations from India overshot the tacitly agreed upon level of reciprocity, in the context of intensifying global challenges? Does the U.S. She asks some enduring questions: has the U.S. Kajari Kamal writes on the grwoing American expectations from India and the implications of such expectations on China-India-U.S. Welcome to this webinar on May 31, 2023! The Institute for Security and Development Policy (ISDP) in Sweden, together with the Prospect Foundation (PF) in Taiwan and the Kajima Institute for International Peace (KIIP) in Japan, brings several international experts to discuss that very question: How to deter China from invading Taiwan?įrom the India Dividend to a Bad Bet: Changing U.S. Against this backdrop, this issue brief by Dhanasree Jayaram and Aanehi Mundra locate climate security within the Indo-Pacific strategies of countries in the region (Australia, New Zealand, the U.S., India, Japan, and South Korea) as well as regional organizations (ASEAN and the Pacific Islands Forum or PIF) besides the European Union (EU), an extra-regional player, and the Quad. Yet there are several impediments to effective collaborative climate action such as the lack of climate finance and geopolitical tensions. Climate action has been prioritized by most countries, including by integrating it into their national security strategies and reiterating the need for cooperation among the countries. They argue that the climate vulnerabilities of the Indo-Pacific region have grown immensely with grave implications for regional, national, human, and ecological security. Climate Security in the Indo-Pacific: Priorities and Challengesĭhanasree Jayaram and Aanehi Mundra write on the strategic need for a greater climate coordination among countries, actors, and stakeholders in Indo-Pacific. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |